White is the New Black?

Opinion piece ~Lynn Matthews
Several states are allowing people to change their gender identity. In fact there are entire legal firms that are helping people to legally change the identity they were born under to a different one. Moving away from the traditional ideology of boys born with a penis were classified as male, and girls born with a vagina, are classified as female. The rules have changed.
There are now gender rules. Rules for being born a certain gender, and rules for identifying with a particular gender. Rules for being born a particular gender, but identifying as another. According to Gender Spectrum, “Individuals do not choose their gender, nor can they be made to change it.”
Applying that logic, one could make the assumption on the issue of heredity. Since individuals do not choose their genetic make up, nor can they change it, perhaps the rules of heredity should apply. One can not control the color of their skin, their facial features of square jaw, size of nose, nor can they control the texture of their hair. Just as one can not control the internal organs or lack thereof they were born with.
According to Cosmopolitan ” Someone who is genderfluid feels that their gender is fluid and can change and vary over time.” Why has no one considered making race a fluid issue? People can identify as one race at one time, and change their race varying over time.
Applying these principles would certainly make the issue of cultural appropriations more acceptable. As in the case of Rachel Dolezal, an American civil rights activist known for claiming to be a black woman while being of European ancestry and having no known African ancestry.
Even Elizabeth Warren, coined by President Trump as “Pocahontas” for claiming Indian American heritage would greatly benefit from a policy such as race-fluid. Simply identifying as a particular race puts you into the category of that race.
Companies would no longer be required to participate in affirmative action hiring quotas from minority communities. Instead, everyone could identify as a disenfranchised race making the disenfranchised race a majority. Colleges required to have a quota of admitting minorities would no longer have to abide due to the fluidity of race. They could concentrate their efforts on finding an academically qualified candidate instead of looking to serve some quota of a particular race.
If people are legally able to identify as a different biological sex, because their biological sex is not under their control, why can they not identify as a different race or heritage, to similarly manipulate the system to their own benefit?

Advertisements

CNN, Blaming Trump for attempted Bombing?

Reading an article, not an opinion piece from CNN one would get the opinion that people are not responsible for their own actions, but rather minions of a controlled mindset led by a devious mastermind bent on controlling someone.  A deep controlling entity viewing only their media enterprise, and filled with such contempt for them, that they would act irrationally and out of character for a human being.

After suspicious packages were sent to many people that Trump had mentioned at his rallies, CNN has taken the position, that the alleged bomber is directly tied to the brain of President Trump.  In their article, which is NOT an opinion piece they cite while discussing the suspicious packages, “What do the targets have in common? They’ve all been targeted by President Donald Trump and made into bogeymen for the far-right, often on Fox News by opinion anchors like Sean Hannity.”

While, this article is an example of not holding accountable a person who acted upon vitriol he had heard it indeed makes the claim of blaming the victim.  Because the people whom had received the packages were indeed the ones whom Trump had discussed at his rallies.

However, a close examination of their vitriolic article, it is easy to see, why someone would contemplate these actions.  Calling out Fake News, at CNN, does not necessarily portray a visceral feeling of hate or contempt, however CNN making the claim, of blaming the victim could easily upset a normal person.  People who act irrationally do so because they are irrational.  Is CNN necessarily acting, or commentating in a rational manner?  According to CNN, Trump has criticized their network numerous times.  Where as their network has reported non-stop since before his presidency on negative Trump issues.  In fact, on slow news days, they have been known to resort back to previous Trump stories just to show contempt for him.  Trump is one man, vs an entire network, with 24/7 coverage cycle, portraying him in a negative form.

As for other examples, lets examine the rhetoric of Maxine Waters, democrat in California at a rally she was holding.  “If you see anybody from that administration, in a restaurant, at a department store, at a gasoline station; you get out and create a crowd, and you push back on them.  And you tell them they’re not welcome.

According to Obama Attorney General Eric Holder, while holding a meeting, he made the claim, “when they go low, we kick them”, resulting in laughter from his audience.

Another example is previous presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again.”

Other examples of poor behavior on behalf of anti-trump supporters can all too well recall Madonna, donning a black cap designed to resemble kitten ears and her vitriolic diatribe where she claimed, “yes, i have thought an awful lot about blowing up the white house” to a crowd of screaming crowd.

According to WND, The Obama administration’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made an impassioned video plea for more marching, blood and death on the streets – a video that was later posted on the Facebook page of Senate Democrats as “words of inspiration.”

Trump supporters, being asked to leave establishments, for openly supporting their candidate, Trump supporters being harassed for attending events where conservative speakers are featured.  The vitriol is non-ending, and CNN and other media outlets who allege they are valid news sources are in a race to discover what new scandal they can uncover with respect to a sitting president.  Yet claim they are the victim of his perhaps distasteful commentary.

If anyone is a victim, it is the American public who are forced by the establishments they visit, airports, restaurants, bars, to watch the endless hours of political commentary aimed at portraying the President they elected as anything less than the President.  They are the real victims here, not a network who divisively portrays the president and the people who believe in him as racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, unintelligent, anti-Americans.

When media outlets report the news, with facts, and qualify their rhetoric as political commentary instead of news worthy topics, perhaps they can then be held with the respect they deserve as journalists, and regain their journalistic integrity, until then they should be labeled and registered as a political pac.

 

 

Title has been Censored

~Lynn Matthews

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That used to be the First Amendment.  Today, however, it is becoming more and more common to censor and gag people who try to use the First Amendment to list their grievances with the government.  More so, to try to disagree with those that are genuinely censoring their ability to disagree.

According to Western Journal, Facebook eliminated “over 559 political pages and 251 accounts in a clamp down on what the social media company calls “inauthentic behavior” in the lead-up to the midterm elections.” Groups such as Right Wing News, Molon Labe Industries, and Overpasses For America have been completely eliminated from the Face Book platform.

For a complete List, click here:

Twitter engineers have admitted to shadow banning many conservative opinions, the censorship has reached such a fervent pitch that the Supreme court is going to hear a case that could determine whether social media users can challenge the social media behemoths.

While the First Amendment is meant to protect citizens against government attempts to limit speech, there are certain situations in which private companies can be subject to First Amendment liability.

Red Hot Media vehemently disagrees with the policies of Southern Poverty Law Center, who is currently being used to check if groups are considered to be racist.  They are used by Social Media Giants to validate if people belong to a “hate group.  In an article they posted in 2017, the brag in bold letters, Twitter has dropped the “verified” status from alt-right leaders Richard Spencer, organizers Laura Loomis and Jason Kessler, English Defence League Founder Tommy Robinson and others.

Southern Poverty Law Center has a hate map encompassing the entire United States, but according to their map, there are mostly conservative groups listed.  According to the Washington Times, Antifa, the anti-fascist fascist group, known for destroying public property, disrupting free speech, and setting fires to buildings do decry, racism,  are not considered to be a hate group.  “You can find conservative policy centers like the Family Research Council on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate map,” but not the violent left-wing extremist group antifa.”

The Main Stream Media CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, are already overwhelmingly covering a political view that goes contrary to conservative principles, and now with the censorship of those viewpoints, from social media, it is challenging to discover information relevant and factual for a more conservative viewer.

In fact, in a leaked document, published by David Brock of Media Matters, he lays out a plan to destroy conservative outlets.  In their policy paper, they openly admit they are collaborating with Facebook and other social media outlets to stop what they opine as “fake news”.

This begs the question, should social media have the right to ban groups that disagree and challenges their platform? Red Hot Media firmly believes that all Americans should have the right to disagree, even vigorously if need be.  However, threats against life, liberty, commerce have no place in a social media platform.  We believe that everyone, regardless of religion, race, political agenda, should have the ability to petition any disagreement openly and fairly.  Is it not the viewer to determine if the news they are reading is fake?  To subscribe to the contrary, would be the equivalent of having proof of UFO landing, only to have it later declared as fake news, when in fact, a UFO did land.

News organizations and outlets, who censor outlets for posting what they determine is “fake news” needs to consider the ramifications of their actions.  There have been several outlets who have posted and had censored stories later to be discovered as truthful.  While we at RHM do not advocate for fake news, we do NOT believe in their censorship.

Immigration Crisis or Political Ploy?

~Lynn Matthews

Call it what you will, immigration of the poor, or an invasion, the facts remain the same.  Approximately 4,000 people from Guatemala, Honduras, and other Central American countries is poised to approach the US border.  Demanding entry into the United States.  The Main Stream Media, would have you believe that every member of this caravan is a political dissident, persecuted by by their government.  Women and children fleeing a corrupt system of justice high crime and poverty.  While, their camera’s try to capture the photos of women carrying their babies on their backs, they miss the fact that surrounding them are a crowd of young men.

The mid-term elections are days away, and it is more than coincidental that this caravan, very well organized is making the treacherous journey, through Central America in pursuit of United States entry.  These people are fully aware that crossing into America without permanent documentation is an illegal act, yet they come.

Newt GingrichNewt Gingrich in an op ed for Fox claims, “The fact is: Thousands of people have openly stated their intention to break American law and invade our country. Other people, some of them Americans, are funding this deliberate effort to invade America.”

One man who was interviewed, claimed Donald Trump is the anti-Christ.  And those men and women approaching the border are making the claim there is no turning back for them.

President Trump, who has been a strong advocate for building a wall between Mexico and the United States, is strongly urging the Democrats to work with him to stop the flow of illegals coming into our country.  “If the Democrats would stop being obstructionists and come together, we could wit up and agree to new immigration laws in less than one hour.  Look at the needless pain and suffering they are causing.  Look at the horrors taking place on the Border.  Chuck & Nancy, call me!” he tweeted.  trump immigration tweet

There are several questions that need to be asked regarding this caravan.  First question is who is organizing this campaign of illegal activities.  Second, who is funding this? But most importantly, with this many people so disgruntled against what is happening in their countries, why can’t they organize for better leadership.  Form a coalition to advance their causes.  Petition their government to address the low employment and crime.  Wouldn’t that be more logical.  Unless someone is making them promises that America isn’t prepared to keep.

immigration2Immigration1immigration3

Porn Lawyer and the Snakes

Porn lawyer to Stormy Daniels has made the press again. This time, making accusations of sexual misconduct by SCOTUS nominee Judge Kavanaugh.  In a tweet on Sunday September 23rd, he claims, “I represent a woman with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge. We will be demanding the opportunity to present testimony to the committee and will likewise be demanding that Judge and others be subpoenaed to testify. The nomination must be withdrawn.”

Avenetti, who gained fame for defending Stormy Daniels in an extortion case against President Trump is promising to throw his hat into the ring for President in 2020, to defeat the sitting President Donald Trump.

Another disturbing tweet, Avanetti claims, “Brett Kavanaugh must also be asked about this entry in his yearbook: “FFFFFFFourth of July.” We believe that this stands for: Find them, French them, Feel them, Finger them, F*ck them, Forget them. As well as the term “Devil’s Triangle.” Perhaps Sen. Grassley can ask him. #Basta.”  Although no evidence has come forward regarding this allegation.

Previous allegations regarding any misconduct with respect to Kavanaugh, have been uncorroborated, as his first accuser, Dr. Christine Ford is unable to provide any evidence, despite having named people who were allegedly at a party she attended where Judge Kavanaugh was named to have attended.

In her allegations, she named four people who had attended a party in the Spring of Kavanaugh Jr. year in High School, all four individuals she has called forward as a witness deny ever being at a party that she was at or that any assault with Kavanaugh ever happened, and refused to corroborate her story.

Avenettitweet

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑