A Crime has Been Committed

Part 3

Mueller and his team of Clinton lawyers

Robert Mueller, who was appointed by Rod Rosenstein, because Jeff Sessions recused himself of any Russian involvement, has been the lead on the special counsel investigation Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

Mueller has unfettered access to investigate anyone for anything they may or may not have done if they were a member of the Trump Transition team.  His investigation has led to the prosecution of Trump transition team member General Flynn, for allegedly Lying to the FBI.

Legal analyst and lawyer Mark Levin has called the special counsel unconstitutional from the appointments clause of the constitution.  Levin argues that, ” Mueller is mostly free to conduct his investigation with few limits or restraints.”

Red Hot Media is intending to expose the many conflicts of interest of the members of Mueller special counsel team.  Let’s meet the team:

 

Jeannie Rhee:Rhee

Jeannie Rhee was hired onto to Mueller special counsel team.  Despite what the partisan hacks at Politico have indicated that Mueller and his team have not hired any Clinton supporters, Red Hot Media has found that Rhee has a history of supporting Clinton.

Rhee had represented the Clinton Foundation against racketeering charges.  She also represented Clinton in a lawsuit seeking access to Clinton private email account.  While working at Mueller’s law firm Rhee represented Ben Rhodes, Obama’s National Security Adviser,  during congress investigation of the Benghazi attacks.

Ryan Dickey:

Ryan worked on the prosecution of Guccifer for the hacks of Clinton long time ally Sydney Blumenthal.  Guccifer also released Clinton emails that proved she was using a private email server, while she was Secretary of State.

Greg Andres:

Greg Andres His wife is Ronnie Abrams.  A US district judge in Manhattan nominated to the bench by Obama in 2011.

Kyle Freeny:

Kyle defended a lawsuit in which Texas and 25 other states that contested an Obama Executive order in 2014 on Immigration.  The Federal Judge accused Freeny of intentional misconduct for misrepresenting facts to him.  The same federal judge, went on to write, “In fact, it is hard to imagine a more serious, more calculated plan of unethical conduct.”

Aaron Zebley:

Aaron is yet another member of the Obama and Clinton cabal looking into the alleged Russian collusion.  Yet Mr. Zebley, himself represented Justin Cooper, the man who set up the Clinton private email server and was responsible for smashing Clinton’s blackberries in an attempt to avoid FOIA requests.

 

 Aaron Zelinsky:zelinsky

Zelinsky was a writer for progressive media outlet Huffpost.  An avid supporter of the former president Barack Obama, Zelinski has been quoted as writing. “Now is the time to begiin enacting a progressive political agenda through the ballot box.”

DOJ guidelines prohibit the use of political affiliation or ideology in making hiring decisions, thus making Mueller decision to hire Mr. Zelinsky conflicted.

Adam Jed:

Adam is most known for defending Kathleen Sebelius, former Health and Human Services Secretary under Barack Obama in a case that went to the Supreme Court, Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius.

He is also known for arguing against the Defense of Marraige Act.

Andrew Goldstein:Goldstein

Goldstein served as former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s Public Corruption chief.  Bahara was fired by President Trump, and claimed to CNN that had he stayed, President Trump would have asked him to do something inappropriate.

The addition of Goldstein is another example of extreme conflict from within the Mueller Special Counsel.

The above named individuals are extremely conflicted with respect to the special counsel Mueller has assembled. It appears that Clinton and Obama are running the special counsel through their interests.

Red Hot Media will continue to update their readers to the conflicted interests that have infiltrated America.  We provide you with the most accurate information available. Several contributors to this story:  Lynn Matthews Tim Walsh, Michael Scott, and JB Berns,

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

A Crime as Been Committed

Part 2

James Comey

A central figure appears within the special counsel.  A man who had once unfettered access to files from the FBI and enormous influence.  The head of the FBI, James Comey,  who played  the role of investigator and judge in the Clinton case with respect to her use of an illegal server.  After 13 minutes of him giving a logical course for indictment he made the claim, “no reasonable prosecutor” would take her case.  He indicated that she had been “extremely careless” with respect to her emails, but that there was no intent to break the law.

For the record, “extremely careless” is synonymous to “grossly negligent”, but the latter carries legal ramifications. The changing of the wording done by Peter Strzok (another familiar name) used in the statement issued at the infamous Comey press conference is significant. It is apparent this was purposely done to avoid qualifying any of Hillary’s actions as technically illegal.  “Extremely careless” is considered to be a casual expression, where as “gross negligence” is a very specific legal definition.

President Trump fired James Comey based on a letter written by Rod Rosenstein that made the recommendation for his termination from his position from the FBI due to insubordination; acting as FBI director and in the capacity of Attorney General.  Comey’s elimination was deemed necessary to restore confidence back to the FBI mainly because of his mishandling of the Clinton investigation, and where pre-determined outcomes regarding her email handling influenced his making a judicial call with respect to it.

Comey big mouth

The Fix

Comey was outraged over his firing, and had decided to use his political pull and FBI contacts to take down the President.  James Comey admitted to Congress under oath that he had leaked memos he had of conversations with the president when he was still head of the FBI.  He gave those memo’s to a friend with the intent that they be leaked in order to prompt appointing a special counsel.  To add insult to injury of in the faith that the FBI was acting as an independent counsel on the special counsel, Comey was advised by the FBI to seek Mueller advice before testifying before Congress.  This provides evidence that there is coordination between James Comey and the Mueller investigation.

If the FBI wasn’t conflicted enough with the Clinton investigation, they are even more tied up with the special counsel under direction of Robert Mueller.  As Gregg Jarrett , legal analyst points out:  “The very people who cleared Clinton of crimes – despite strong evidence that she broke the law – also assumed unfettered authority over the so-called “collusion” investigation to determine if Donald Trump’s presidential campaign worked with Russia to help Trump become president.”

James Comey and Robert Mueller have had a long history of working together.  Their relationship isn’t some loosely fitting work relationship as the media would have you believe.  In fact, according to the Huffington Post . “Mueller as FBI Director and James Comey as Deputy Attorney General, both presided over post-9/11 cover-ups and secret abuses of the Constitution, enabled Bush-Cheney fabrications to launch wrongful wars, and exhibited plain vanilla incompetence.

James Comey has been a long time critic of the President and has declined any responsibility in the lack of confidence the American public has in the Bureau reputation.  When asked by a reporter after a closed door hearing by the House Judiciary and Oversight committee if  he “shared any of the responsibility” for the decline in the FBI’s reputation as an unimpeachable, non-partisan agency, Comey answered simply: “No.”

“The FBI’s reputation is taking a big hit because the president has lied about it constantly. A whole lot of people who watch your network [Fox News] believe that nonsense. That’s a tragedy that will be undone eventually, but that damage has nothing to do with me,” he added.

Tomorrow We will Bring you Part 3 of this series in the Crime has been committed

If you have any comments or questions please send us a message.

 

 

 

 

Mueller Investigation: Ending the Probe that Never Should have Started in the First Place

By Lynn Matthews & Tim Walsh

Its been over a year since the Mueller investigation began looking into allegations of collusion or any kind of Russian interference in the 2016 election of President Trump.  So far the special counsel has indicted, charged, and brokered plea deals with several Trump associates for process crimes such as tax-evasion or lying to the FBI, charges that have nothing to do with anyone attempting to work with any Russians to interfere with, or change the outcome of the 2016 election results.

Robert Mueller even went into examining the tax records of Paul Manafort, a former campaign manager for President Trump; in an attempt to “flip”, or bully him into testifying against the president.  Having the FBI arrest him in an early morning home raid using SWAT team tactics that can be described as those they would use for a serial killer or foreign terrorist.  They did not have the proper warrant to do so until after the fact.

The Mueller Investigation went to investigating Michael Flynn, a United States Army Lieutenant General who served this country for more than 33 years. Mueller had the FBI place Flynn under arrest for allegedly Lying the the FBI.  Flynn was later cleared.

The most troubling issue, despite all the media hype, is the fact that Mueller is looking for a man to fit a crime that has yet to be discovered.  The firing of James Comey was used in an attempt to decry that President Trump fired Comey to obstruct justice.  Many on both sides of the political aisle called for his firing, some blamed him for Hillary’s elections loss.  It was James Comey who lied to congress with respect to denying leaking of documents, then later he admitted to leaking of documents to compel the creation of a special counsel.  An absolute double standard of the law.

Another significant consideration with respect to obstruction is that Rod Rosenstein wrote the letter to President Trump referring him to fire James Comey.  Then turns around and appoints a special counsel to investigate the firing of  James Comey as potential obstruction.  Because Rod Rosenstein wrote that letter, that makes him a fact witness in “the incident” of firing James Comey.  For him to oversee the investigation of firing Comey as potential obstruction is a severe conflict of interest.  One can easily argue its the textbook definition of conflict of interest.

While looking for a man to fit the crime, Mueller has went after Dr.  Jerome Corsi, author and Trump supporter for alleged ties with Wikileaks that he may or may not have had.  He has threatened Dr. Corsi with prosecution because Dr. Corsi forwarded an email to someone looking for a contact with Wikileaks editor Julian Assange.  When Dr. Corsi was allowed to amend his statement to the FBI due to his memory, they accused him of lying to the FBI.  Incidentally, one of the lawyers prosecuting Dr. Corsi is Jeannie Rhee, who was a member of the legal team defending Clinton illegal use of a private server.

Dr. Corsi believes that he has been ensnared in a perjury trap at the behest of the special council investigating him, and has filed a wrongful prosecution against Mueller.  Jeannie Rhee, Aaron Zelinsky, and Andrew Goldstein are the lawyers representing Mueller in the special investigation against Dr. Corsi.

Mr.  Zelinsky is no stranger for advocating for political hardball when it comes to the Democrat party.  His prior blog history which is no longer available is proof of his strong political bias when it comes to the Democratic party, and as the Daily Caller wrote, “he encouraged Obama to emulate the strong-arm tactics of former President Lyndon Johnson. “He wasn’t afraid to get down and dirty with the legislative branch, arm twisting, cajoling, and sometimes bullying senators to vote his way,” Zelinsky said of Johnson.”

Andrew Goldstein, who worked for Preet Bharara, the former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, was fired by Trump.  His twitter account shows a particular bias as seen by his profile description.

preet-e1543611320394.jpg

Most importantly in the Mueller investigation is the legality of the appointment.  According to Todd Young, in an article published by Newsmax, “Robert Mueller and his band of erstwhile “Special Assistant United States Attorneys” have power to which they are not entitled — in violation of the checks and balances and separation of powers spelled out in the U.S. Constitution, full stop.

Mark Levin, radio host, and constitutional scholar called the appointment of Mueller unconstitutional and he even referred to it as a violation of the law. He pointed out that not only was the special counsel’s appointment not done in accordance with Article 2 Section 2 of the Constitution, but not in accordance with the Special counsel statute that lapsed in 1999, or even the DOJ Internal regulation appropriating a special counsel.

In many ways, with no initial crime to investigate, Robert Mueller should have never been appointed in the first place.

Should Congress shut down Mueller?  We report you decide.  Let us know what you think.

 

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑