A Crime has Been Committed

Part 3

Mueller and his team of Clinton lawyers

Robert Mueller, who was appointed by Rod Rosenstein, because Jeff Sessions recused himself of any Russian involvement, has been the lead on the special counsel investigation Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

Mueller has unfettered access to investigate anyone for anything they may or may not have done if they were a member of the Trump Transition team.  His investigation has led to the prosecution of Trump transition team member General Flynn, for allegedly Lying to the FBI.

Legal analyst and lawyer Mark Levin has called the special counsel unconstitutional from the appointments clause of the constitution.  Levin argues that, ” Mueller is mostly free to conduct his investigation with few limits or restraints.”

Red Hot Media is intending to expose the many conflicts of interest of the members of Mueller special counsel team.  Let’s meet the team:

 

Jeannie Rhee:Rhee

Jeannie Rhee was hired onto to Mueller special counsel team.  Despite what the partisan hacks at Politico have indicated that Mueller and his team have not hired any Clinton supporters, Red Hot Media has found that Rhee has a history of supporting Clinton.

Rhee had represented the Clinton Foundation against racketeering charges.  She also represented Clinton in a lawsuit seeking access to Clinton private email account.  While working at Mueller’s law firm Rhee represented Ben Rhodes, Obama’s National Security Adviser,  during congress investigation of the Benghazi attacks.

Ryan Dickey:

Ryan worked on the prosecution of Guccifer for the hacks of Clinton long time ally Sydney Blumenthal.  Guccifer also released Clinton emails that proved she was using a private email server, while she was Secretary of State.

Greg Andres:

Greg Andres His wife is Ronnie Abrams.  A US district judge in Manhattan nominated to the bench by Obama in 2011.

Kyle Freeny:

Kyle defended a lawsuit in which Texas and 25 other states that contested an Obama Executive order in 2014 on Immigration.  The Federal Judge accused Freeny of intentional misconduct for misrepresenting facts to him.  The same federal judge, went on to write, “In fact, it is hard to imagine a more serious, more calculated plan of unethical conduct.”

Aaron Zebley:

Aaron is yet another member of the Obama and Clinton cabal looking into the alleged Russian collusion.  Yet Mr. Zebley, himself represented Justin Cooper, the man who set up the Clinton private email server and was responsible for smashing Clinton’s blackberries in an attempt to avoid FOIA requests.

 

 Aaron Zelinsky:zelinsky

Zelinsky was a writer for progressive media outlet Huffpost.  An avid supporter of the former president Barack Obama, Zelinski has been quoted as writing. “Now is the time to begiin enacting a progressive political agenda through the ballot box.”

DOJ guidelines prohibit the use of political affiliation or ideology in making hiring decisions, thus making Mueller decision to hire Mr. Zelinsky conflicted.

Adam Jed:

Adam is most known for defending Kathleen Sebelius, former Health and Human Services Secretary under Barack Obama in a case that went to the Supreme Court, Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius.

He is also known for arguing against the Defense of Marraige Act.

Andrew Goldstein:Goldstein

Goldstein served as former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s Public Corruption chief.  Bahara was fired by President Trump, and claimed to CNN that had he stayed, President Trump would have asked him to do something inappropriate.

The addition of Goldstein is another example of extreme conflict from within the Mueller Special Counsel.

The above named individuals are extremely conflicted with respect to the special counsel Mueller has assembled. It appears that Clinton and Obama are running the special counsel through their interests.

Red Hot Media will continue to update their readers to the conflicted interests that have infiltrated America.  We provide you with the most accurate information available. Several contributors to this story:  Lynn Matthews Tim Walsh, Michael Scott, and JB Berns,

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

A Crime as Been Committed

Part 2

James Comey

A central figure appears within the special counsel.  A man who had once unfettered access to files from the FBI and enormous influence.  The head of the FBI, James Comey,  who played  the role of investigator and judge in the Clinton case with respect to her use of an illegal server.  After 13 minutes of him giving a logical course for indictment he made the claim, “no reasonable prosecutor” would take her case.  He indicated that she had been “extremely careless” with respect to her emails, but that there was no intent to break the law.

For the record, “extremely careless” is synonymous to “grossly negligent”, but the latter carries legal ramifications. The changing of the wording done by Peter Strzok (another familiar name) used in the statement issued at the infamous Comey press conference is significant. It is apparent this was purposely done to avoid qualifying any of Hillary’s actions as technically illegal.  “Extremely careless” is considered to be a casual expression, where as “gross negligence” is a very specific legal definition.

President Trump fired James Comey based on a letter written by Rod Rosenstein that made the recommendation for his termination from his position from the FBI due to insubordination; acting as FBI director and in the capacity of Attorney General.  Comey’s elimination was deemed necessary to restore confidence back to the FBI mainly because of his mishandling of the Clinton investigation, and where pre-determined outcomes regarding her email handling influenced his making a judicial call with respect to it.

Comey big mouth

The Fix

Comey was outraged over his firing, and had decided to use his political pull and FBI contacts to take down the President.  James Comey admitted to Congress under oath that he had leaked memos he had of conversations with the president when he was still head of the FBI.  He gave those memo’s to a friend with the intent that they be leaked in order to prompt appointing a special counsel.  To add insult to injury of in the faith that the FBI was acting as an independent counsel on the special counsel, Comey was advised by the FBI to seek Mueller advice before testifying before Congress.  This provides evidence that there is coordination between James Comey and the Mueller investigation.

If the FBI wasn’t conflicted enough with the Clinton investigation, they are even more tied up with the special counsel under direction of Robert Mueller.  As Gregg Jarrett , legal analyst points out:  “The very people who cleared Clinton of crimes – despite strong evidence that she broke the law – also assumed unfettered authority over the so-called “collusion” investigation to determine if Donald Trump’s presidential campaign worked with Russia to help Trump become president.”

James Comey and Robert Mueller have had a long history of working together.  Their relationship isn’t some loosely fitting work relationship as the media would have you believe.  In fact, according to the Huffington Post . “Mueller as FBI Director and James Comey as Deputy Attorney General, both presided over post-9/11 cover-ups and secret abuses of the Constitution, enabled Bush-Cheney fabrications to launch wrongful wars, and exhibited plain vanilla incompetence.

James Comey has been a long time critic of the President and has declined any responsibility in the lack of confidence the American public has in the Bureau reputation.  When asked by a reporter after a closed door hearing by the House Judiciary and Oversight committee if  he “shared any of the responsibility” for the decline in the FBI’s reputation as an unimpeachable, non-partisan agency, Comey answered simply: “No.”

“The FBI’s reputation is taking a big hit because the president has lied about it constantly. A whole lot of people who watch your network [Fox News] believe that nonsense. That’s a tragedy that will be undone eventually, but that damage has nothing to do with me,” he added.

Tomorrow We will Bring you Part 3 of this series in the Crime has been committed

If you have any comments or questions please send us a message.

 

 

 

 

A Crime has Been Committed

PART 1

A crime has been committed, and not even the media has acknowledged it.  Its a crime against the people of America, an elected President, his transition team, and his closest friends and allies.

Long-standing policy in America was to have a crime, and investigate the crime.  People accused of such a crime were presumed to be innocent until proven guilty.  Not so in this case.  An American man has been under investigation for a crime.  A crime yet to be determined.  In doing so, in an attempt to investigate the not yet determined crime, people have been sentenced to jail terms, that have nothing to do with the undetermined crime.

Who is the real criminal here is the actual question.  Some people would have you believe the criminal in question is our President.  The crime, collusion with a foreign government.  However, after examining all the evidence at hand, Red Hot Media has determined that the real crime has been conducted by non other than our own government.

Wikipedia has a timeline of events, however, after researching these events, several of their sources and alleged facts can not be verified.  One such example is the article the Guardian published with respect to the president.  One falsely reported fact leads RHM to believe that the site in question is compromised, and that the information reported is false and misleading.

Red Hot Media wants to use their own timeline to establish facts, not speculation or opinions.

POWER

To begin this theory, we started looking at what was happening prior to the election of the President.  In the months prior to Trump taking office, Samantha Power, US ambassador to the United Nations was unmasking American civilians.  As Devin Nunes chairman of the House Intelligence community writes, “[T]his Committee has learned that one official, whose position has no apparent intelligence-related function, made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama Administration,” he wrote to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats.”

President Obama had recently amended EO12333, making obtaining classified information from various sources easier, due to the fact that now 17 different agencies had access to raw data from the National Security Agency.  Establishing a precedent that it would be conceivably more difficult to root out leakers within different agencies.  According to the Atlantic, the updated procedures will multiply the number of intelligence analysts who have access to NSA surveillance, which is captured in large quantities and often isn’t subject to warrant requirements.”

fLYNN

General Flynn

Michael Flynn, a member of Trumps transition team was questioned in January 2016 by the FBI.  According to the FBI original notes, the FBI did not suspect General Flynn of lying to them with respect to a conversation he had with Russian Ambassador Kisylak. Even though Flynn was a private citizen at the time of the conversation, he was a member of the transition team to the President.  His conversation should not have been unmasked or available to be heard by foreign or domestic intelligence agencies, according to the 4th amendment.

According to the Goldwater, General Flynn was a set up in that the 302, had been altered.  The 302 are documents that the FBI uses when interviewing witnesses.  Also, other news sources have made the claim that the FBI did not want General Flynn to have legal counsel when they were interviewing him.  Special Counsel lead Mueller, an un-elected lead investigator appointed by Rod Rosenstein has been the leading charge into finding guilt from Trumps transition team.  Initially charged with finding the source of Collusion from Russia, his scope has changed to pressing charges against everyone involved, seeking men to fit the crime of collusion.

The Washington Examiner, McCabe, who arranged the interview with Flynn,  “by his own account, urged Flynn to talk to the agents alone, without a lawyer present. I explained that I thought the quickest way to get this done was to have a conversation between [Flynn] and the agents only,  McCabe wrote. I further stated that if LTG Flynn wished to include anyone else in the meeting, like the White House counsel for instance, that I would need to involve the Department of Justice. [Flynn] stated that this would not be necessary and agreed to meet with the agents without any additional participants.”

Several members of Trumps inner circle have been brought up on charges of lying to the FBI.  Trump long time lawyer Michael Cohen was among one, when they raided his office for evidence of alleged collusion, thus denying attorney client privileged in order to search for a crime.  Also, a violation of 4th Amendment protections.

Due to the many integrated parts of this developing story, Red Hot Media will be breaking it into several pieces.  This story has many pieces and many separate story lines,  Stay Tuned for Part 2.

Unmasking Antifa

Antifa, the alleged anti-fascist fascist group terrorizing events where conservatives congregate, to discuss ideas and engage in civil discourse is now being exposed.  This masked group claiming to be hidden to protect their identity has found themselves in a bit of a pickle.  There is a group of patriots actively engaged in “unmasking” this domestic terrorist group.

Patriot Wrath.

While the rest of the country is terrified of this terrorist organization by the comments RHM has been getting with respect to running this article, Patriot Wrath is posting the names and occupations of these masked individuals responsible for beating, doxing, and setting on fire, and stopping conservative speakers from exercising their rights to free speech.  There are incidents whereby ANTIFA protesters are website developers, advertisers, and teachers in elementary schools, as well as at the University level.

The Department of Homeland Security was said to have classified their activities as domestic terrorism and there is a long list of of those activities some are posted below.

  • Protesting the 2016 election of President Trump
  • Throwing of Molotov cocktails and smashing windows at a Milo Yiannopoulos speaking engagement
  • Threatening to disrupt the 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade after hearing the Multnomah County Republican Party would participate.
  • 2017 Unite the Right rally whereby a woman was killed
  • Berkley protest, “say No to Marxism” that had to be cancelled to prevent civil unrest.

In addition to the above said list, a group of Antifa masked protesters harassed motorists on the streets of Portland.

Antifa with their masked faces and violent tactics have prompted Congress to introduce Bill H.R. 6054: Unmasking Antifa Act of 2018.  The law in general:  Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, while in disguise, including while wearing a mask, injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both.

Red Hot Media had the amazing opportunity to interview Patriot Wrath, who will be exposing these Antifa terrorists and providing information to their viewers with respect to who they are and where they work.  @PatriotWrath claimed, “We sat on the sidelines too long and watched these people attack and ruin the lives of people who simply love America.  The time for standing down has passed.  We are just sick of seeing Antifa use these doxing tactics to harass whoever does not share the same views”

Special Thanks for the heads up to Ted at TC media.  Ted has an amazing show nightly, where he discusses news of the day, with facts as well as good humor and lively conversation.

Red Hot Media works to bring you the truth in media.  If you have comments, suggestions, or tips, please leave us a message.

 

 

California Allowing Illegal Voter Fraud

Orange County California a strong hold of conservatism, recently had their county flip from Red to Blue after the 2018 election results rolled in.  What happened exactly is the question everyone is asking.  How could a county opposed to sanctuary status, and liberal policies turn from a conservative strong hold into a progressive held county.

To understand the issue in its entirety, you must look at California as a whole picture.  California is one of the most populous states, and has 53 representatives to cover their population.  It is a state that has a good deal of internal problems.  From border crossing, to high gas prices, from earthquakes, to wild fires, and of course San Francisco being labeled the “poo” capital of the United States.  Yet, the people of California are determined to keep the state one of the highest cost to income ration states to live in.

How could the people living there be so self absorbed as to not look out their window and see what is happening in their state.  Some media pundits claim the loss of Republicans is due to Trump.  Some even going so far as to make ridiculous claims that they wouldn’t support candidates running that supported the President.  However, the majority of the country disagrees with this theory.

Another theory given by the Washington Examiner is that Democrats outspent, out campaigned and were intimately involved in colleges and universities electing Democrats in their state.  Michael S.  resident of Orange County California told Red Hot Media, “my daughter was told in class to get to the polls”.  A similar sentiment from other college students around the state.  Basically bullying them into participating in the mid term election.

While the above theories may hold true as to why republicans lost the election in California, another issue that has been presented, and hushed up is that of ballot harvesting.  While Californians were basking in the climate of warm weather, sunny beaches, and mountains, Jerry Brown current governor signed, a change to the law AB-21 two years ago.  This change, even though a minor change allowed anyone from street sweeper, to pan-handler to collect ballots, and deliver them to polling booths. Also included are Provisional ballots for homeless, and “motor voter” registration for illegal aliens allowing them to vote on Federal elections, not just state elections. 

According to Ballotpedia, “Ballot harvesting: A person requests a mail ballot for someone else or steals a mail ballot, then uses that ballot and forges the intended recipient’s signature. Also refers to filling out a ballot for someone else who has requested assistance in filling out a ballot, rather than assisting them.  It is listed as voter fraud.

According to Town Hall, this law, referred to as ballot harvesting,  “amounts to an open invitation to large-scale vote buying, voter coercion, ‘granny farming,’ and automated forgery. AB 1921 solves no problem that a simple stamp can’t solve.”  According to the San Francisco Chronicle, “Election Day vote-by-mail drop-offs was unprecedented — over 250,000.”  With the population of Orange County being 3.1 million, 250,000 harvested ballots would surely play a significant role in who was elected to the house of senate.

At any rate, Orange County California has completely turned into a Democrat strong hold, and it will eventually be supporting sanctuary status to supplement their democratic votes.  Having a super majority in the state, rest be assured conservative legislation will not be considered and certainly not passed.

Did California new policy of ballot harvesting affect the election? We report, you decide.

 

 

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑