Bob Menendez Threatens Police Action on Daily Caller Reporter

After being cleared from legal charges of bribery and corruption, Bob Menendez (D) New Jersey got some much unwanted press again. Apparently, Menendez thinks the press is worthy of police action.

In a fiery exchange between Henry Rogers of the Daily Caller, when Rogers asked Menendez to comment on the “Green New Deal” Menendez refused to answer. Following up with a question from Rogers intern, Menendez, had nothing short of a “temper tantrum”, calling the Daily Caller “trash”. Audio can be heard here.

“I am wondering why you won’t answer questions on the Green New Deal?” Rodgers asked.

Menendez responded with, “I won’t answer questions to the Daily Caller, period! You’re trash!”

Daily Caller reporter followed with, “Why do you think we are trash sir?”

“Don’t keep harassing me anymore or I’ll race to the Capitol Police,” Menendez responded.

Henry Rogers Daily Caller

Twitter was quick to respond to Menendez police action as James Woods, actor and political activist pointed out, “Democracy Dies in Darkness, unless you don’t like the news source, then call the police…”

James Woods on bob menendez

Dana Loesch, spokeswoman for NRA was quick to point out the hypocrisy making the claim, ” I was told that any criticism of the press was an un-American attack on free speech, though? Or has that standard changed?

Dana Loesh

Apparently, the congressman thinks its acceptable to grant an impromptu interview to reporters that paint his escapades in a favorable light, but an outlet that gives a more balanced view of congress is worthy of legal attention?

Did Bob Menendez over react, or is this going to be the new norm for Congress? Calling the police when confronted by a news outlet that they disagree with? We want your opinion. Feel free to leave a comment at admin@wecunews.com

Have a tip or news story drop us a line.

Advertisements

White is the New Black?

Opinion piece ~Lynn Matthews
Several states are allowing people to change their gender identity. In fact there are entire legal firms that are helping people to legally change the identity they were born under to a different one. Moving away from the traditional ideology of boys born with a penis were classified as male, and girls born with a vagina, are classified as female. The rules have changed.
There are now gender rules. Rules for being born a certain gender, and rules for identifying with a particular gender. Rules for being born a particular gender, but identifying as another. According to Gender Spectrum, “Individuals do not choose their gender, nor can they be made to change it.”
Applying that logic, one could make the assumption on the issue of heredity. Since individuals do not choose their genetic make up, nor can they change it, perhaps the rules of heredity should apply. One can not control the color of their skin, their facial features of square jaw, size of nose, nor can they control the texture of their hair. Just as one can not control the internal organs or lack thereof they were born with.
According to Cosmopolitan ” Someone who is genderfluid feels that their gender is fluid and can change and vary over time.” Why has no one considered making race a fluid issue? People can identify as one race at one time, and change their race varying over time.
Applying these principles would certainly make the issue of cultural appropriations more acceptable. As in the case of Rachel Dolezal, an American civil rights activist known for claiming to be a black woman while being of European ancestry and having no known African ancestry.
Even Elizabeth Warren, coined by President Trump as “Pocahontas” for claiming Indian American heritage would greatly benefit from a policy such as race-fluid. Simply identifying as a particular race puts you into the category of that race.
Companies would no longer be required to participate in affirmative action hiring quotas from minority communities. Instead, everyone could identify as a disenfranchised race making the disenfranchised race a majority. Colleges required to have a quota of admitting minorities would no longer have to abide due to the fluidity of race. They could concentrate their efforts on finding an academically qualified candidate instead of looking to serve some quota of a particular race.
If people are legally able to identify as a different biological sex, because their biological sex is not under their control, why can they not identify as a different race or heritage, to similarly manipulate the system to their own benefit?

Border Security

~Lynn Matthews and JB Burns

Red Hot Media has taken a position on border security and we believe we have a plan that is a win-win for all parties involved to protect the nation from the incredible tax burden that has been plaguing our nation for several decades now.  Please read our proposal and give us your input.

Reasons for better border security and how to achieve it

According to fairus.org, there are 12.5 million illegal alien residents living in the United States today.   “The Federal government spends a net amount of $45.8 billion on illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children. This amount includes expenditures for public education, medical care, justice enforcement initiatives, welfare programs and other miscellaneous costs. It also factors in the meager amount illegal aliens pay to the federal government in income, social security, Medicare and excise taxes.”

Federal Education:  $1,691,034,040

Medical Expenditures:  $17,135,594,572

Justice Expenditures:  $13,148,609,360

Welfare:  $5,849,236,360

Total:  $45,870,474,332

Regardless of the number of illegals crossing the border, the number living here, the cost to the federal government, the American citizen and tax payer is footing the bill.  These figures do not include criminal activity of unaccounted illegals working for cash.  The situation is, these figures are unsustainable for America. And the there needs to be a program that deters the illegally entry and taking of residence into America.

For the purpose of this proposal, we are not going to include loss of life, or human trafficking just statistics that are easily obtained via a search of government database and other related internet search engines.

The border wall is approximately 1,970 miles that separates the United States from Mexico.

Figures for a physical barrier between the United States and its southern neighbor vary according to data:  “In July 2016, Bernstein Research, a firm that analyzes material costs, put the price tag at $15 billion to $25 billion, for a wall that stretches 1,000 miles and is 40 feet high, which was Trump’s initial desired height.”

Department of Homeland security estimates the cost to build a more secure border is around $21 Billion.

Despite the high price tag for a more secure barrier between the United States and Mexico, the cost of securing the border to prevent the illegal entry of persons seeking to take advantage of American tax payers is priceless.

Here is what we are proposing to the president as an alternative plan for achieving a bipartisan deal to accomplish better border security.

The cost to implement a physical barrier would be approximately 21B.  The savings in one year alone would be approximately 20B given the figures above.

We believe we can get congress to approve the spending of such funds if the following were implemented.

  1. Grant citizenship to Daca recipients.  Since it was not their fault for illegally crossing the border.
  2. Amnesty with fines but no citizenship unless four years of service in military.
  3. Any illegal who have committed felonies do not qualify and should be deported immediately
  4. E-verify. For work, education, all visa holders.  Tie in work visa student visa to addresses and employment.
  5. End anchor baby citizenship if not a resident for five years prior birth of the child, and five years after. There should be no tolerance for people coming to the United States to have children born with American benefits who have no vested interest in the country.
  6. Immediate deportation for anyone overstaying visa, or committing a felony.  Including drunk driving. Suspend due process for the above said crimes.  And fully eliminate court costs for deportation hearings based on felonies committed.
  7. Harsh penalties for employers who knowingly hire illegals, who do not report to ICE officials when seasonal employment ends.

 

 

This plan must be sold a s a compassionate solution to a very long time expensive problem.  It would give the President leverage for wall funding as well as provide a compassionate response to the members of congress who want to eliminate any barriers between southern border and United States.

 

Thank you for your time,

Sincerely,

 

A Crime has Been Committed

Part 3

Mueller and his team of Clinton lawyers

Robert Mueller, who was appointed by Rod Rosenstein, because Jeff Sessions recused himself of any Russian involvement, has been the lead on the special counsel investigation Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

Mueller has unfettered access to investigate anyone for anything they may or may not have done if they were a member of the Trump Transition team.  His investigation has led to the prosecution of Trump transition team member General Flynn, for allegedly Lying to the FBI.

Legal analyst and lawyer Mark Levin has called the special counsel unconstitutional from the appointments clause of the constitution.  Levin argues that, ” Mueller is mostly free to conduct his investigation with few limits or restraints.”

Red Hot Media is intending to expose the many conflicts of interest of the members of Mueller special counsel team.  Let’s meet the team:

 

Jeannie Rhee:Rhee

Jeannie Rhee was hired onto to Mueller special counsel team.  Despite what the partisan hacks at Politico have indicated that Mueller and his team have not hired any Clinton supporters, Red Hot Media has found that Rhee has a history of supporting Clinton.

Rhee had represented the Clinton Foundation against racketeering charges.  She also represented Clinton in a lawsuit seeking access to Clinton private email account.  While working at Mueller’s law firm Rhee represented Ben Rhodes, Obama’s National Security Adviser,  during congress investigation of the Benghazi attacks.

Ryan Dickey:

Ryan worked on the prosecution of Guccifer for the hacks of Clinton long time ally Sydney Blumenthal.  Guccifer also released Clinton emails that proved she was using a private email server, while she was Secretary of State.

Greg Andres:

Greg Andres His wife is Ronnie Abrams.  A US district judge in Manhattan nominated to the bench by Obama in 2011.

Kyle Freeny:

Kyle defended a lawsuit in which Texas and 25 other states that contested an Obama Executive order in 2014 on Immigration.  The Federal Judge accused Freeny of intentional misconduct for misrepresenting facts to him.  The same federal judge, went on to write, “In fact, it is hard to imagine a more serious, more calculated plan of unethical conduct.”

Aaron Zebley:

Aaron is yet another member of the Obama and Clinton cabal looking into the alleged Russian collusion.  Yet Mr. Zebley, himself represented Justin Cooper, the man who set up the Clinton private email server and was responsible for smashing Clinton’s blackberries in an attempt to avoid FOIA requests.

 

 Aaron Zelinsky:zelinsky

Zelinsky was a writer for progressive media outlet Huffpost.  An avid supporter of the former president Barack Obama, Zelinski has been quoted as writing. “Now is the time to begiin enacting a progressive political agenda through the ballot box.”

DOJ guidelines prohibit the use of political affiliation or ideology in making hiring decisions, thus making Mueller decision to hire Mr. Zelinsky conflicted.

Adam Jed:

Adam is most known for defending Kathleen Sebelius, former Health and Human Services Secretary under Barack Obama in a case that went to the Supreme Court, Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius.

He is also known for arguing against the Defense of Marraige Act.

Andrew Goldstein:Goldstein

Goldstein served as former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara’s Public Corruption chief.  Bahara was fired by President Trump, and claimed to CNN that had he stayed, President Trump would have asked him to do something inappropriate.

The addition of Goldstein is another example of extreme conflict from within the Mueller Special Counsel.

The above named individuals are extremely conflicted with respect to the special counsel Mueller has assembled. It appears that Clinton and Obama are running the special counsel through their interests.

Red Hot Media will continue to update their readers to the conflicted interests that have infiltrated America.  We provide you with the most accurate information available. Several contributors to this story:  Lynn Matthews Tim Walsh, Michael Scott, and JB Berns,

 

 

 

 

 

A Crime as Been Committed

Part 2

James Comey

A central figure appears within the special counsel.  A man who had once unfettered access to files from the FBI and enormous influence.  The head of the FBI, James Comey,  who played  the role of investigator and judge in the Clinton case with respect to her use of an illegal server.  After 13 minutes of him giving a logical course for indictment he made the claim, “no reasonable prosecutor” would take her case.  He indicated that she had been “extremely careless” with respect to her emails, but that there was no intent to break the law.

For the record, “extremely careless” is synonymous to “grossly negligent”, but the latter carries legal ramifications. The changing of the wording done by Peter Strzok (another familiar name) used in the statement issued at the infamous Comey press conference is significant. It is apparent this was purposely done to avoid qualifying any of Hillary’s actions as technically illegal.  “Extremely careless” is considered to be a casual expression, where as “gross negligence” is a very specific legal definition.

President Trump fired James Comey based on a letter written by Rod Rosenstein that made the recommendation for his termination from his position from the FBI due to insubordination; acting as FBI director and in the capacity of Attorney General.  Comey’s elimination was deemed necessary to restore confidence back to the FBI mainly because of his mishandling of the Clinton investigation, and where pre-determined outcomes regarding her email handling influenced his making a judicial call with respect to it.

Comey big mouth

The Fix

Comey was outraged over his firing, and had decided to use his political pull and FBI contacts to take down the President.  James Comey admitted to Congress under oath that he had leaked memos he had of conversations with the president when he was still head of the FBI.  He gave those memo’s to a friend with the intent that they be leaked in order to prompt appointing a special counsel.  To add insult to injury of in the faith that the FBI was acting as an independent counsel on the special counsel, Comey was advised by the FBI to seek Mueller advice before testifying before Congress.  This provides evidence that there is coordination between James Comey and the Mueller investigation.

If the FBI wasn’t conflicted enough with the Clinton investigation, they are even more tied up with the special counsel under direction of Robert Mueller.  As Gregg Jarrett , legal analyst points out:  “The very people who cleared Clinton of crimes – despite strong evidence that she broke the law – also assumed unfettered authority over the so-called “collusion” investigation to determine if Donald Trump’s presidential campaign worked with Russia to help Trump become president.”

James Comey and Robert Mueller have had a long history of working together.  Their relationship isn’t some loosely fitting work relationship as the media would have you believe.  In fact, according to the Huffington Post . “Mueller as FBI Director and James Comey as Deputy Attorney General, both presided over post-9/11 cover-ups and secret abuses of the Constitution, enabled Bush-Cheney fabrications to launch wrongful wars, and exhibited plain vanilla incompetence.

James Comey has been a long time critic of the President and has declined any responsibility in the lack of confidence the American public has in the Bureau reputation.  When asked by a reporter after a closed door hearing by the House Judiciary and Oversight committee if  he “shared any of the responsibility” for the decline in the FBI’s reputation as an unimpeachable, non-partisan agency, Comey answered simply: “No.”

“The FBI’s reputation is taking a big hit because the president has lied about it constantly. A whole lot of people who watch your network [Fox News] believe that nonsense. That’s a tragedy that will be undone eventually, but that damage has nothing to do with me,” he added.

Tomorrow We will Bring you Part 3 of this series in the Crime has been committed

If you have any comments or questions please send us a message.

 

 

 

 

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑